Creation of well-balanced experimental groups for comparative endodontic laboratory studies: a new proposal based on micro-CT and in silico methods.

AIM: To introduce a new method to select anatomically matched teeth using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) technology. METHODOLOGY: Single-rooted mandibular incisors with a single root canal (n = 60) were selected and distributed into three experimental groups according to the method used for matching 10 pairs of teeth in each group. In group 1, the pairs of mandibular incisors were randomly selected from a pool of teeth. In group 2, teeth were paired based on the measurement of canal width 5 mm from the root apex using radiographs taken from buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. In group 3, teeth were scanned (pixel size of 14.25 µm) and pair-matched based on the anatomical aspects of the root canal, named aspect ratio (AR), volume and three-dimensional canal geometry. After allocating the specimens into groups 1 and 2, the teeth were scanned and the canal morphology evaluated as in group 3. A bivariate Pearson's regression analysis was performed correlating the individual AR values of each pair, and the correlation coefficient was used to estimate the strength of the pair-matching process. One-way anova post hoc Tukey's tests were applied for pairwise comparisons at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The micro-CT revealed that 100% of the samples had strong (80%) or very strong (20%) correlations with respect to AR values. Analysis of the radiographic method revealed strong correlation in two pairs (20%), but most of the samples had weak (30%) or negligible (30%) correlation coefficients. The randomization method resulted in three pairs (30%) with very strong correlations, whilst 50% had weak or negligible rates. A significant difference in correlation coefficients was observed in the micro-CT method compared to the other groups (P < 0.05), whilst no difference was detected between radiographic and randomized methods (P > 0.05). Eta-squared (η2 ) calculations demonstrated a very high effect size in the micro-CT group for selecting pairs (0.99) and lower effect sizes in the radiographic (0.67) and randomized (0.66) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Micro-CT was able to provide better control of the confounding effect that anatomical variances in tooth morphology may have on the results in experiments with matched-pair design.

Validation of contralateral premolars as the substrate for endodontic comparison studies.

AIM: To use micro-CT technology and metrology software to validate the use of contralateral premolars as samples in endodontic comparison studies by comparing them before and after canal instrumentation with one instrumentation system. Furthermore, to determine whether contralateral premolar roots (CPRs) will yield non-significantly different outcomes regarding shaping ability (volume), degree of twisting and three-dimensional shape changes. The null-hypothesis (H0 ) is that there are no differences between the CPRs pre- or post-instrumentation. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-eight extracted human contralateral premolars (n = 44 contralateral roots) from 12 donor patients were scanned with microcomputed tomography before and after instrumentation. Root canal lengths (RCLs) were measured visually using a dental-operating microscope, electronic apex locator and micro-CT scans. Data were analysed statistically for differences between pre- and post-instrumentation. RESULTS: Instrumentation increased the volume of the canals significantly (P < 0.05). Degree of twisting for a majority (83%) of the contralateral roots pairs did not change significantly (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the shape deviation analysis between contralateral pairs. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) for RCL between the contralateral pairs for any of the three endometric methods. CONCLUSION: Contralateral premolar root canals were associated with similar changes in terms of volume, three-dimensional shape and degree of twisting from pre- to post-instrumentation. There was no difference between the CPR pairs pre- and post-instrumentation, and the study validates contralateral premolars as samples for root canal comparison studies. The null-hypothesis (H0 ) could not be rejected.